Thursday, September 8, 2016
The Past is the Dead in “Crimson Peak”
In Guillermo del Toro’s “Crimson Peak,” the Old World of Europe is dark, crumbling, and incestuous, populated by parasites who live off of titles and the labor of others, while the New World of America is bright, full of life, promise, and people who live by their own labor. Del Toro makes this distinction in the film’s color palette. Bright yellow dominates the opening scenes in Buffalo, but the scenes in England are grey, dark blue, and an unsettling green. The great aristocratic house is falling apart and literally bleeding. But this distinction between the past and the future is not as simple as it seems. There are ghosts on both sides of the Atlantic.
“You’re always looking to the past, Thomas,” American Edith tells her new English husband while they take shelter in an inn during a snowstorm. “You won’t find me there,” she says. Edith lays on a bed in warm, golden light, while the snowstorm casts a cold green light through the window. Thomas is lit in both gold and green, fitting for a man conflicted even before the story begins, a man of the Old World who wants to embrace the industrial spirit of the New World. It would be easy to read the film as a warning against living in the past.
Yet “Crimson Peak” has a far more nuanced view of the relationship between the Old and the New. As much as Edith’s father claims that America values hard work instead of privilege, the American aristocracy in this film worships the Old World: see the awe with which they observe Thomas’ demonstration of the “European style” waltz. And the unsettling green light occasionally appears in America, usually to herald the arrival of a ghost.
The film itself is drawn to the past. Del Toro’s camera is as in love with the European style waltz as the characters are. The story fully embraces the trappings and emotions of an old genre: Gothic Romance. Twilight has demonstrated how elements of that genre have filtered into modern pop culture, but Del Toro is not after an updated Gothic Romance. He’s trying to recreate the real thing. He also draws on fairy tales. The story of a young woman being whisked away to a mysterious castle evokes the Gothic Romance of Jane Eyre, a novel that drew from “Beauty and the Beast,” which in turn drew from Apuleius’ story of Cupid and Psyche. The addition of a husband who has murdered his previous wives evokes “Bluebeard.”
“Crimson Peak” is also filled with references to cinema history. The use of a secret key that the heroine must steal evokes “Bluebeard,” but it also evokes Hitchcock’s “Notorious,” as does the attempt to poison the heroine with tea. There are also numerous similarities to Orson Welles’ “The Magnificent Ambersons,” another film with complicated feelings about the ending of one world and the beginning of another. The turn-of-the-century setting and the presence of one of those newfangled motorcars are perhaps minor connections, but the use of irises to open and close scenes is so striking that it is easy for a cinephile to be reminded of Welles’ film. The film may be frightened of the past, but it is also in love with it.
Paradoxes are often more interesting than simple declarations. It is far more interesting for Del Toro to present a nuanced view of the past than a simple condemnation of obsessing over it. The depiction of an American aristocracy that values hard work over European privilege yet worships European culture is particularly striking. Fundamentally, the film depicts the past as ugly and beautiful, frightening and alluring, something to escape and something to love.
Friday, May 27, 2016
Harry Potter and the Web of Authorship
![]() |
| Photo by Colloquium |
And perhaps you might find it relevant to a lot of conversations happening now. Nearly every time a Marvel picture rolls around, people wonder about the capacity to which a franchise blockbuster can be a distinctive work in which a director expresses a personal vision. Critics like Matt Zoller Seitz and Scott Tobias have expressed misgivings about the homogeneity and lack of directorial expression that they perceive in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
I enjoy nearly all of the Marvel films, love a few of them, and think Age of Ultron is one of the most interesting blockbusters in recent years, but I think I can sum up my similar misgivings by saying: the MCU hasn't had a Prisoner of Azkaban yet.
As I say in the thesis, I don't believe it would be completely accurate to call Prisoner of Azkaban an auteurist film. Even though auteurism rose out of studying studio genre pictures, it is possible that today's franchise framework does not allow a director-for-hire to make an auteurist work. However, Prisoner of Azkaban is a distinctive work of cinema that manages to fit into both the Harry Potter franchise and Alfonso Cuarón's filmography. It presents the possibility that authorship of a franchise blockbuster is not a matter of who has creative control, but is rather a negotiation, a web of authorship.
If that sounds interesting to you, I present my thesis:
The structure of a blockbuster franchise is one that suggests homogenization and broad appeal rather than idiosyncrasy and personality. In this context, the already collaborative and often corporate nature of most mainstream filmmaking sees an increase of influencing creative factors. A studio needs to make a global hit that provides a return on the investment of a large budget, armies of artisans and craftspeople work to produce images of spectacle, and there is often a need to maintain continuity with other films and fidelity to a source material. The nature of this context seems to stifle the notion of directorial authorship. As much as scholarship has complicated the romantic idea of the singular author of any artwork, it has not killed the idea of a director expressing a personal vision through a film. It is possible to see this in scholarship on a filmmaker like Alfonso Cuarón, who has attracted interest for distinctive films such as Y tu mamá también (2001) and Children of Men (2006), but whose contribution to a blockbuster franchise, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004), is mostly ignored. In works devoted to examining Cuarón’s films in depth, James Udden labels Azkaban “generic Hollywood fare” and Deborah Shaw defines it as “non-auteurist”; both make these definitions in contrast to a more conventionally auteurist work of Cuarón’s like Y tu mamá también. These views suggest a belief that Cuarón has had a strong authorial voice in creating other films, but that this voice could not be present in a Harry Potter film. Certainly a claim that Cuarón is the author of Prisoner of Azkaban would be an oversimplification, but an opposite claim would also ignore the tension among the multiplicity of creative influences on the film. Rather than simply being a case of a director imposing a vision upon material or being a servant to corporate interests, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban showcases the franchise blockbuster as a complex authorial web that serves as a site of negotiation between different authorial voices.
Read more...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


